At the moment, EU Fee president Ursual von der Leyen gave her State of the Union speech in Brussels.
Our Head of EU Affairs, Anaïs Berthier was listening, and seen a worrying discrepancy when it got here to the surroundings.
Reacting to the speech, she mentioned: “The Fee is correct to reject the established order and purpose for systemic change for the surroundings and public well being however there’s a discrepancy between phrases and deeds right here.
“For instance, agriculture is a big supply of air pollution, air pollution which damages our well being and the surroundings, however the CAP is being adopted on the legislative proposal that predates each this Fee and the adoption of the European Inexperienced Deal (EGD).
“The CAP shouldn’t be aligned with the EGD and the Farm to Fork technique. That is the established order and at odds with the precept of consistency enshrined within the EU Treaty. Systemic change shouldn’t be taking place right here, which signifies that the surroundings and public well being aren’t going to enhance.
“The EU price range nonetheless subsidies fossil fuels. That is the established order. Simply yesterday the Parliament voted on the Simply Transition Fund and agreed to let in a big derogation for fossil fuel.”
“It’s additionally not sufficient to emphasize the significance of the rule of legislation, it must be embedded in precise choices. There must be sturdy conditionality within the EU price range and the Subsequent technology EU plan with a strong mechanism to make sure compliance from Member States which profit from EU monetary help.
Berthier concluded: “So fantastic phrases must be matched with sturdy motion. In any other case this Fee will preserve the established order, which is unhealthy for the surroundings and for public well being.”
The publish Key EU Fee speech: gaps between phrases and motion appeared first on ClientEarth.